Ukrainian delegation in Geneva divided over peace deal

Part of the team is in favour of a quick agreement under the auspices of the United States, while others call for no rush

0
4

A quick deal or better terms later - a debate in the Ukrainian delegation

The Ukrainian delegation at the talks on ending the war has actually divided into two approaches to a possible peaceful settlement. This was reported by the media outlet The Economist with reference to sources familiar with the consultations.

According to journalists, one group believes that The window of opportunity for a political agreement may close quickly, The United States is committed to reaching an agreement as soon as possible under the mediation of the United States.

At the same time, the other camp is convinced that Haste may harm Ukraine's strategic interests, The Ukrainian government should not be afraid to take action, as Kyiv's position may eventually strengthen both on the battlefield and in the international arena.

Two approaches to ending the war

According to the publication:

  • Supporters of a quick deal emphasise the risk of prolonging the war and changing the political situation in the world;

  • Opponents believe that future conditions may be more favourable for Ukraine, so premature compromises should be avoided.

This distribution of positions reflects a broader discussion within the Ukrainian political and security leadership on the optimal strategy for ending the war.

The role of the president

The President of Ukraine is trying to balance both approaches, The government has to keep the space for negotiations, but at the same time avoid decisions that could weaken the state in the long run.

The talks in Geneva are taking place against the backdrop of a difficult situation at the frontline and active diplomatic contacts with Western partners, which makes any possible agreements even more important.

Context.

Recent months have been characterised by:

  • intensive international consultations on the format of peace;

  • discussions on security guarantees for Ukraine;

  • finding a balance between military pressure on Russia and diplomatic instruments.

The further course of the negotiations will largely depend on the position of the allies, the situation on the battlefield and the internal consensus of the Ukrainian leadership.

Leave a Reply