Over UAH 150 million was paid as bail for the former head of the Presidential Office, Andriy Yermak. The payers include well-known businessmen, lawyers and companies operating in various fields.
Who paid and how much
As collateral for Andriy Yermak The money was transferred by 7 individuals and 7 legal entities. The total amount exceeded UAH 150 million, which became one of the most high-profile collateral stories of recent years.
Among individuals, the largest contribution was made by Sergey Rebrov - 30 million hryvnias. Sergey Sviriba paid UAH 6.5 million, Rosa Tapanova - UAH 8 million, Vladimir Petrov - 80 thousand UAH, Igor Fomin - UAH 5 million, Alina Voloshina - UAH 368 thousand, Alexander Krikunov - UAH 500 thousand.
Legal entities also actively contributed to the fundraising. The largest amount of UAH 32 million was contributed by SU'SEM LLC. The Scientific Research Forensic Institution donated UAH 30 million, Miralif LLC - UAH 9.8 million, A. Dva. CA. T - UAH 4 million, PE SV-GROUP - UAH 10.2 million, JSC De Lege Lata - UAH 14 million, and LLC Arena Marine - UAH 4 million.
The context of the Yermak case
The bail for Andriy Yermak has become the subject of intense public and media attention. The number of participants and the amount raised in a short time indicate a significant resonance around the case. As a reminder, Yermak recently resigned as head of the Presidential Office and was investigated. The bail procedure stipulates that the suspect may be released from custody under financial guarantees.
The legal entities that contributed funds come from a variety of sectors, from expert institutions to lawyers' associations and private enterprises. This may indicate the broad support or interest of various business groups in this case.
Why it matters
The large-scale bail for Andriy Yermak demonstrates how high-profile and socially significant his case has become. The involvement of a large number of individuals and legal entities underscores the high level of interest and potential impact on the further course of the investigation. Such precedents set new standards of publicity in high-profile criminal trials in Ukraine.
